Stone and Clay, Masculine and Feminine
Crash through the surface...
A Symbolic Layer in the Parable of the Master’s House
“Knowledge initiates, wisdom receives, guides and tempers. Knowledge can be dangerous unless it is informed by wisdom. Wisdom provides guidance and counsel to channel what comes from knowledge. Creation begins with the active initiative of knowledge, but order and harmony for the creation requires wisdom. Balance between them is required for an orderly creation to exist.”
- Our Divine Parents
Before anything else, a gentle orientation.
When I use the words masculine and feminine here, I am not talking about men and women as groups. I am not assigning roles to genders or dividing the parable’s characters into male and female camps. I am speaking symbolically, the way scripture often does, about two spiritual patterns every human soul carries within it.
Every one of us has stone and clay inside us, structure and softness, discipline and creativity, law and relationship. This post is simply an attempt to uncover one symbolic layer in a parable that Denver himself said has many meanings.
Now, with that frame in place, let's walk into the story.
When the parable opened a new door
I wrote earlier about unity, labor, and transformation in the parable of the servants sent to build a house in a far off land. That layer is still valid. But as I have been studying the balance of the divine feminine and the divine masculine, the contrast between the stone workers and the clay workers began to echo something deeper.
Not the meaning of the parable, but an application of it.
Not doctrine, just a pattern.
The more I sat with it, the more it illuminated the tension our own community is wrestling with right now.
A few recent conversations, especially those shaped by the way some sisters have approached the parable through the heart rather than the head, opened this layer even further.
Stone as the masculine pattern within the soul
Stone work is heavy, deliberate, patient. It requires discipline, endurance, and structure. In scripture, stone is always the image of foundation, law, covenant, and steadiness.
Denver’s written interpretation draws this out when he connects the stone directly to the doctrine and law of Christ, the stable path that prepares the way to the high place of safety and beauty.
That is the masculine principle.
Not “men,” but the inner spiritual force that holds lines, protects covenants, honors order, and builds roads so others can follow.
Every one of us needs that side of the soul.
Without it, we collapse.
Clay as the feminine pattern within the soul
Clay is responsive, relational, creative, and attentive. It listens to what is present instead of imposing a preconceived form. It adapts, discerns, and brings forth shape from the raw material of the earth.
In the parable, the servants who work with clay are the ones who finally build the house. They arrive at the place the master chose, notice what is hidden beneath the grass, uncover the clay, and form something habitable.
That is the feminine principle.
Not “women,” but the inner spiritual force that nurtures connection, shapes community, creates dwelling places, and builds environments where life can flourish.
Every one of us needs that side of the soul.
Without it, we wither.
The “tree and tool” group as the unrefined self
One group remains. The servants who rushed ahead assuming tools, wood, and familiar patterns. In this symbolic reading they represent neither masculine nor feminine energy. They represent the unrefined ego in every soul.
This is the part of us that wants obedience without transformation. It reaches for whatever patterns we already know, not because they are evil, but because they are comfortable and safe. Their early failure is not wasted. It is the necessary humbling that prepares the ground for stone and clay to finally meet.
A covenant people cannot be gathered until this layer in each soul is laid down.
The failure in the parable is the same imbalance we face today
The problem in the story is not stone, and it is not clay.
The servants fail because the two modes of labor never meet.
The masculine pattern and the feminine pattern remain isolated.
Each group is faithful. Each group is sincere.
And each group ends up working alone.
They never join forces. They never integrate strengths.
They never build together.
That is where the real reproof lies, and it is also where the symbolic light makes our own situation clearer.
Our community has people operating almost entirely in the masculine mode, emphasizing law, structure, order, and precedent.
We also have people operating almost entirely in the feminine mode, emphasizing harmony, relationship, atmosphere, and unity.
Both sides have gifts.
Both sides have shadows.
And neither can build the Master's house alone.
Where this touches the divine feminine today
I want to say something carefully, because this has been weighing on me for months.
We have begun to talk more openly about the divine feminine, about the need to restore her place among us. This is not optional. Zion cannot exist without the feminine being fully honored.
But there is a distortion that easily slips in.
If feminine contributions are treated as beyond correction,
or if feminine contributions are treated as too sacred to examine,
or if “sustaining priesthood” becomes a shield from accountability rather than a shared stewardship,
then we are not honoring the feminine.
We are infantilizing her.
And clay that is never shaped, never examined, never refined, never fired, cannot become a brick.
It remains soft, fragile, and unable to carry the weight of a house.
The feminine principle is not fragile.
It is ferocious in its capacity to bring life, create connection, and form community.
But like the masculine principle, it is meant to be tempered, challenged, corrected, and refined.
Accountability is a divine principle, not a gendered burden.
Where this touches the divine masculine today
At the same time, masculine energy becomes distorted when it refuses to adapt, clings to old patterns, or insists that the house must match what the master’s former house looked like. That was the stone carriers’ mistake.
Masculine discipline needs feminine discernment.
Structure needs relationship.
Law needs love.
Roads need homes.
Zion requires the marriage of stone and clay
In the end, the house is built from clay and the road is paved with stone. The master praises both. Both are necessary. Both are faithful. But the deeper lesson is the one the Lord repeats:
Love one another.
Labor together.
Learn what you ought.
The masculine cannot replace the feminine.
The feminine cannot replace the masculine.
Separately, each group in the parable was faithful.
Separately, each group also failed.
Zion is not built by tribes.
Zion is built by integration, by the reconciliation of divine opposites within the soul and among the people.
Stone becomes the road.
Clay becomes the house.
Together, they form a dwelling place fit for God.
Creation itself rests on this marriage of knowledge and wisdom, initiative and receptivity. If the universe is built this way, then Zion will be also.
This symbolic layer has helped me understand our own struggle: we are still learning how to bring both principles into harmony. We are still learning how to labor in love instead of division. We are still learning how to become the living house our Master wishes to inhabit.
May we learn the balance creation was founded upon.
May we become the people who can finally build together.
Music Interlude
Two very different voices, two very different worlds, stepping onto the same stage and choosing to meet instead of compete. You can feel the appreciation they have for each other's contribution, imperfect as it may be. It is an image of what the parable asks of us. Stone and clay, masculine and feminine, learning to blend and create something neither could form alone. No shallow harmony. Only a willingness to enter the deep water together.
Also, the piano playing is impressive and the cinematography is beautifully done. One of my favorite live performances.
Comments
Post a Comment